What the Complaint Against Officials González Beltrán and Casimiro Morales Alleges About the Decision Not to Prosecute
Bryan Alejandro González Beltrán, a Baja California Sur state prosecutor, and Consuelo Erica Casimiro Morales, acting head of a regional deputy prosecutor's office, have been named in a criminal complaint filed with the authorities. According to their documents, he proposed and she authorized a decision not to prosecute in the Querencia Los Cabos case, dated February 11, 2026. According to the complaint, it is in neither a set of certified copies of the investigation file (316 fojas) nor copies handed over on August 26, 2026 (403 fojas). According to the transcription of the ruling, on September 23, 2026, a pretrial judge revoked it because it was not properly grounded or reasoned. In the same ruling, the judge considered that not prosecuting was warranted as to the companies.
The decision and who signed it
In Mexico, state prosecutors (the Ministerio Público) investigate and decide whether to take conduct before a judge. When they decline, they issue a decision not to prosecute (no ejercicio de la acción penal).
The investigation stems from a March 25, 2025 crash at Querencia Los Cabos between a truck bearing Querencia markings and a golf cart.
According to the decision, dated February 11, 2026, and its authorization, it proposed not prosecuting, for atipicidad, in favor of Querencia Real Estate, S. de R.L. de C.V., Querencia Golf Club, S. de R.L. de C.V., and the club doctor, José Luis Sánchez Musi, who is under investigation, for failure to render aid, failure to file a medical report and concealment (encubrimiento). According to those documents, the same applied to the driver, who is under investigation.
Atipicidad means conduct that falls outside how the law defines an offense. According to the decision, the driver would still be prosecuted for unintentional bodily injury and property damage.
According to the decision, it was proposed by Bryan Alejandro González Beltrán, a state prosecutor with the Baja California Sur State Attorney General's Office (Procuraduría).
According to its authorization, dated February 13, 2026, Consuelo Erica Casimiro Morales approved it as acting head (encargada de despacho) of the Southern Zone Regional Deputy Prosecutor's Office for Criminal Proceedings.
What the complaint contends about the file copies
Prosecutors keep each investigation in an investigation file (carpeta de investigación) made of numbered sheets, called fojas. The parties to a case can be given copies of it (copias de traslado).
On August 26, 2026, copies of the investigation file, 403 fojas (numbered sheets) long, were handed over to the parties.
According to the complaint, the decision dated February 11, 2026, did not appear among those 403 fojas. Nor, according to the same complaint, did it appear in a set of certified copies of the investigation file, 316 fojas long.
The hypothesis the complaint asks authorities to investigate
A criminal complaint (denuncia) formally notifies the authorities of conduct that may be an offense, so it can be investigated.
The two officials above have been named in a criminal complaint filed with the authorities. According to the complaint, the alleged offenses are unlawful exercise of public service, falsehood by public servants and denial of justice.
The complaint alleges that the decision may have been concealed, removed or inserted into the file after the fact.
What the pretrial judge decided
A pretrial judge supervises the investigation stage of a case, before any trial.
According to the transcription of the ruling, on September 23, 2026, a pretrial judge (Juez de Control) in Los Cabos revoked a prosecutor's decision not to prosecute specific offenses, dated February 11, 2026, and authorized on February 13, because it was not properly grounded or reasoned, and ordered the investigation to continue. In the same ruling, the judge considered that not prosecuting was warranted as to the companies (personas morales).
See the decision not to prosecute and the ruling.
Key questions
What does the complaint allege about the decision in the Querencia Los Cabos case?
According to the complaint, the decision not to prosecute dated February 11, 2026, is not in two sets of copies of the investigation file, including those handed over on August 26, 2026. The complaint alleges that the decision may have been concealed, removed or inserted into the file after the fact.
What did the pretrial judge decide about the decision in the Querencia Los Cabos case?
According to the transcription of the ruling, a pretrial judge revoked it on September 23, 2026, because it was not properly grounded or reasoned, and ordered the investigation to continue. In the same ruling, the judge considered that not prosecuting was warranted as to the companies (personas morales).
Keep reading
See the complaint against two officials.
See what happened at Querencia Los Cabos.
This page will be updated when the next step in the case is on record.